You Can Always Tell

Occupy Jacksonville

Posted in The Latest News | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“I Love Who You Are”…

I Love Who You Are

I have a plan.
A dream.
A thought.
But those are the smallest of wishes.
I carry you with me  in my heart.
In my thoughts.
You are part of my plan.
And surely that is no dream.
That is reality.
You are my second half.
No matter where I am.
Or who I am with.
Our meetings have been as–
Strangers.
Friends.
Lovers.
And more.
I love the time we have spent together.
And cherish  the things you have given me.
The cards.
The letters.
The jewelry.
The mementos.
But most of all–
Your love and friendship.
You have given your opinion.
On what those things mean.
But I know what they mean to me.
You have found your happiness.
Mine was lost for a long, long time.
You helped me find it.
And I will never forget.

I love who you are–

Posted in Contributions, Philosophy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

What kind of Army do we Need?…..

“There is no army on earth as powerful as an idea whose time has come”
-Victor Hugo-

Posted in Favorite Quotes, Philosophy | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Chapter 5

How Many Kinds of Smart?

Everyone has heard of or
read about Charles Darwin, right?  Not a
great student, by most accounts.  Was
relatively unknown before he decided to go on an ocean voyage and was amazed at
the countless number of plants and animals he came in contact with that he
never knew existed.  Shortly after this
he developed his revolutionary theory of evolution.  Part of the reason I believe there still is
controversy over his theory is that he didn’t fit the conventional mold of what
is thought of as “smart”.  Darwin
possessed a type of intelligence that can be categorized as naturalistic
intelligence (the ability to recognize and find patterns in things like plants,
animals, rocks—or even clouds for that matter.)  As you may have figured out by now, there are
many different kinds of “smart” needed to make decisions on a daily basis.  Here are some more examples of the complex
kinds of “smart” that allow us (and the Tweedles) to excel in various life
activities:

1.
Michael Jordan
(athletic complexity) vs. Dockworker (task complexity)

Michael
Jordan is an example of an athlete who has excelled in his sport because of his
ability to master athletic complexity.
He was named the most valuable NBA player in 1987, 1990, 1991, 1995 and
1997.  Michael Jordan has been able to
distinguish himself from other players because of his athletic attributes. His
could accelerate in a surprising and unanticipated way and perform incredible
runs. He dribbled at full speed, and when arriving in front of an opponent, he
could change direction suddenly, leaving his confused rival trying to catch up behind
him. He completed these speed runs with high profile, accurate dunks.

I
can’t cite an example of a specific dockworker like I have with Michael Jordan,
but certainly a dockworker performing his or her daily duties requires a
different kind of “smart” job complexity.
The
dockworker works together with coworkers, but also has separate job
responsibilities. Similar to a pro sports player, right? The dockworker must be
a problem solver in technical areas and also when faced with unexpected
situations. Athletes must perform in like scenarios. The dockworker regularly
has to work under difficult conditions, such as bad weather, which bring with
it risks to health and safety. The potential for injury is always present
with a pro athlete.  The dockworker’s “smarts”
require the application of standard routines and the execution of a number of
defined tasks. Again similar to a pro sports player’s responsibilities. Even
though the dockworker must be relatively physically fit, the demands required
of a dockworker are nowhere near what is required of an elite pro sports
player.  As I hope you can see from these
examples, the pro sports player must perform many of the same types of tasks to
that of a dockworker, but must employ a different set of “smarts” to accomplish
them.

Take a look at the examples I have listed below and
see if you can come up with a list of the “smarts” required of Tweedle Dum and
Tweedle Dee that would enable them to make decisions and choices:

2.
Singer (tone
complexity) vs. Poet (word complexity)

When I refer to a singer vs. a poet, I am referring to how each has
different skills they employ in order to communicate to their audience.  Of course they both utilize both words and
sounds to make themselves understood, however, they use them in different
ways.  The singer uses the tone of
his/her voice to communicate the feelings, emphasis and movement of the story
he/she is endeavoring to transmit to the listener.  The poet uses words in differing sequences
and combinations to transmit the same type of information.  Both need to utilize different skills in
order to successfully pass on the feelings felt by the writer/singer.

3.
Conductor (group
complexity) vs. Violinist (song complexity)

When a conductor works with an orchestra, he uses specific cues and
actions to communicate his/her thoughts and intentions to the individual
performers in the orchestra.  These are
learned—and require a specific set of “smarts” in order to be transmitted
accurately and effectively to the specific performers.  The actions of the individual performers
require a different kind of “smarts”…knowledge and understanding of the music
that has been selected to be performed.
The violinist is a follower…while the conductor is the leader.  Both have different roles…but must be similarly
knowledgeable about the requirements to successfully communicate through
music….the message of the composer.

4.
Architect (3-d
complexity) vs. Painter (2-d complexity)

The “smarts” required of each of these Tweedles require much of the same
skills—but utilized in different ways.
I’m sure both the architect Tweedle and the painter Tweedle “paints” a
picture in their mind of what they want their final product to look like.  The final design/painting is just presented
in a slightly different form.  Of course,
both the painter and the architect both can produce both 2-d and 3-d images,
but the final result is one or the other.
The skills involved in coming up with the final product also require
different skills—but start out from a common point.

5.
Shaman vs. Preacher/Priest
(belief complexity)

Are they the same…or are they different?
If they are the same…how are they the same?  If they are different…how are they
different?  Do they employ or utilize
similar types of “smarts” or are they dissimilar?  One way we could say that these Tweedles are
the same is that they both refer to holy men or women.  Preachers may or may not be seen as “holy”…
holier than the average person in their church for example. Preachers, by their
name and calling– preach sermons. Through their sermons, they try and clarify
things that answer questions that their congregations (or a gathering of
people) have about daily living, dying, and death.

Priests are similar to preachers in the Catholic church… but they are
considered holier than the average parishioner.

Preacher and priest are used to refer to a Christian minister, whereas a Shaman
is a medicine man or woman and usually is not a Christian.

How are they are similar?   Well…Shamans
do ritual…and priests do ritual…Shamans have their own set of dogma… as do
preachers…which concentrate on dogma and attempt to explain the traditions and
interpretation of certain holy books.

Shamans may be public minded as Preachers and Priests are… but also
disseminate their knowledge for a fee, whereas priests and preachers are
thought of as religious leaders.

Where they are different however, is that Shamans exist only  in pre-industrial societies whereas  Priests and preachers are part of the power
structures of industrial societies.  They
both have a set of “smarts” that they utilize in order to reach a specific
goal.

 6.
Salesperson
(interpersonal complexity) vs. Psychiatrist (intrapersonal complexity)

Interpersonal “smarts” refers to the capacity of Tweedles to understand
the intentions, motivations and desires of other people. A salesperson Tweedle,
for example, would utilize these “smarts” in order to work effectively with
others. Sales Tweedles all need well-developed interpersonal “smarts” to be
successful.

Intrapersonal intelligence refers to the capacity to understand a Tweedles
feelings, fears and motivations. Utilizing these types of “smarts”, Tweedles
would use this type of information to understand, and attempt to make decisions
in order to regulate their personal lives.
Of course, there also can be some crossover—some similarities in
“smarts” that both use to make decisions. Doctors, for example often  utilize interpersonal “smarts” …an example of
which would be drug company sponsored “education”  whose content then is transferred to a patient…in
order to promote and recommend… the corporate sponsors’ drugs.

  How easy was it to come up with ways to
“decide” what to do or accomplish the tasks presented in each of these
different scenarios?  Now, not only is it
necessary for people to learn how to make “smart” decisions, it is also
necessary to utilize learned skills in a manner that allows one to make
informed choices.  Choice-making is
required of us and the Tweedles countless times each day, and decision-making
is one of the main drivers in the direction of our lives.  Let’s take a look at how Tweedle Dee and
Tweedle Dum “decide” to follow a particular course of action.

Posted in Read A Chapter | Leave a comment

Question…..

Question

I would like to say that on the day she died,
The world stopped living,
As she had;
Or, at least,
That I did.

But life went on as before.
The sun rose, dawn broke, birds sang,
And under my window, people chattered, and laughed, and lived,
As they always have.

I lived, too.
I made phone-calls and conversation and coffee.
I ran errands and arranged furniture and people.
I dressed her in her best clothes and covered her with bright flowers.
I lit incense and sang hymns and accepted condolences.
And, finally,
I wept as if my heart would break as they took her away.

But my heart did not break.
And I still live. And love. And laugh.
As when she was alive.

Does she see this and wonder?

Posted in Contributions | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Latest From WordPress…

State of the Word

This has been an exciting year for WordPress. We’ve grown to power 14.7% of the top million websites in the world, up from 8.5%, and the latest data show 22 out of every 100 new active domains in the US are running WordPress.
Posted in The Latest News | Leave a comment

Finally…Evolution Explained…by a Mere Line….

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Socialism…or Capitalism…Which do you Prefer?

 

So…are you against Socialism?  Big, Bad Socialism. With a capital “S”.  Really?  Or are you a Capitalist? The best economic invention on Earth?  Well, I thought I ‘d present a few pros and cons of the different systems. This was originally written to a specific individual, so if you see references to  one person, that is the reason.

I’d appreciate your comments one way or the other…..

Believe it or not,our government has implemented  “socialist” policies—policies like
the institution of a minimum wage, Medicare, and a progressive tax structure,
to name a few examples. These policies have no doubt alleviated, and in many
cases eliminated some of the hardships of living under the poverty level for
many, many Americans. And, up until recently, these measures were seen as a
benefit overall to society.   Yes—a BENEFIT….
Even though you continually point to your “facts” that socialism is a failed
system, how do you explain the socialist states of Sweden, Denmark, Norway and
Finland?  Let’s be honest here, there really
are no ideologically pure socialist states, just like there are no pure
capitalist states– and the socialist ones that are– sure as heck  don’t cherish capitalism as a God-given right
like we do.  But, do not  believe me; check, the “facts”… in the list of
the world’s best countries, these Scandinavian “states “always rank at the very
top. How can you discredit socialism as leading to inevitable destitution,
deficit and demise, when these modern states have successfully implemented many
aspects of this much looked down upon- system. Capitalism, on the other hand,
or what we really have in America—a Corporatocracy, (a
system of government that serves the interest of, and may be run by,
corporations and involves ties between government and business. Where
corporations, conglomerates, and/or government entities with private
components, control the direction and governance of a country, including
carrying out economic planning notwithstanding the ‘free market’ label.)—
is the law of the land. Capitalism originally existed to award those who worked
hard to escape a social class that prevented movement—including personal,
social, and financial growth. Recently, from my vantage point, the Capitalists
have taken the opportunities that were meant for those who truly needed them
and twisted them to further their own self-aggrandizement.

You now seem to believe that it is no longer beneficial– in
fact harmful–to assist those who have no control of their own financial
standing.  This has caused the American
people (you), to return to an era when Social Darwinism marked people as either
those fit to succeed in society—and those who were not—based on their social
station and financial assets. Your mistaken view that we should not have to
cater to the poor just because they are poor (and therefore unfit) has lead to
the polarization of the American population into the obscenely wealthy and the
poor.

If America were to remove all vestiges of socialism from its
society, as you seem to promote, here is what would happen.  Let us see if you really do not believe in
socialism, as you say.

Police Departments

Fire Departments

Roads, Highways & Bridges

Airports

Public Transportation

Utilities, like Electricity & Water

Education for everyone

Healthcare & Hospitals

Public Defense (Military)

Parks

Environmental Protection

Publicly funded sports facilities

Social Security retirement benefits

Libraries

Child Care

Subsidies to Farmers & other businesses

Aid to foreign nations

Knowledge & exploration of space & science in
general

My belief, and the reason I defend this type of government,
is that it is a system of government, where all come together to provide for
our general welfare & to insure domestic tranquility.  Those last words come from our Constitution.
Yes, surprising as it may be to you, our founding fathers wanted a
society that served “all the people within the society”, not just a few at
the top.

Ok—then what makes Capitalism so great?   Well, there are at least 3 things to say
about Capitalism that it does do well.

1. It does generate
competition. There is a fluctuating cycle, by way of performance—that a company
can build a near-monopoly position for itself. This position is inevitably followed
by erosion, break-up, and a renewal of competition again. All bad things aside,
competition does in many cases, gives us choices, and to a point, incentivizes
providers. It is the best way we have figured out so far of matching supply and
demand.

2. Interest. Despite your
constant objections to it, the fact that interest is paid on loans is, for the
most part a good thing. It allows earlier purchases of goods and services–
with payments spread over time, and with it increases in productivity and standard
of living. As I—for example, not being a slave sold in the market, a black mark
if there ever was one on American history  (I might say we are returning to that however)
I can figure out what I am worth in cash terms, just as if I were a car or a computer
or a piece of machinery.

3. How this applies to human labor.  Maybe you have forgotten that before
capitalism became “Capitalism”, most workers were serfs or slaves. Serfdom died
as capitalism developed as an institution. Capitalism set these indentured
servants free. In the present day however, many so –called “free” workers—who are
desperate for employment –might welcome the security of servitude, where at
least they are provided shelter and a meal. Here is where your hatred of those “lazy,
welfare cheats” you so often refer to appear. History does show that the
ability to move from place to place and job to job has been a huge factor in
raising the standard of living of the lowest classes.  As you can also see, our current situation
impedes social mobility—and consequently decreases standards of living. SURPRISE—-Capitalism
made trade unions possible.  Why?  Because they are monopolist and capitalist,
institutions that attempt to corner the supply of labor and raise its price. Unions
however, depend on the freedom of the individual worker for their
effectiveness. Take away worker freedoms…and you destroy unions. Now you may
see why the Corporatists are so intent on breaking the unions.  To put it another way….modern “ serfs”—
cannot be unionized.

After all this
discussion—I guess I can’t really say that capitalism is ‘so great’ – all I
can say is it is at best the least imperfect type of system we have come up
with.

Capitalism is not heaven – but if I find a better system—I’ll
go for it!

Posted in Philosophy, Recommended Articles | Leave a comment

Lost Myself…

I looked for my self,
but my self was gone.

The boundaries of my being
had disappeared in the sea.

Waves broke.
Awareness rose again.

And a voice returned
me to myself.

~ Rumi

Posted in Contributions, Favorite Quotes | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Story of the Bamboo Tree…

A lot of times we hear people saying that one exposure to a positive or a negative material does not have any impact. That is not true. The difference may not be visible but something is happening.

In China there is a bamboo tree which is planted, watered and fertilized for the first four years and nothing happens. There is no visible sign of growth.

But sometime during the fifth year, the bamboo tree grows about 90 feet in six weeks. The question is: Did the bamboo tree grow in six weeks or did it take five years to grow even though there was no visible sign it was taking root in the ground? When there was no visible sign, if someone had stopped watering and fertilizing it, would this have happened? Certainly not.

The bamboo tree would have died. We need to learn from nature and the lesson is pretty clear. Have patience and faith and keep doing the right thing. Even though the results may not be visible, something is happening.

Posted in Contributions, Philosophy | Tagged , | 3 Comments